Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Did America Really Land on the Moon? - Felix

1)Logical consistency: Dr. David Groves is expert in photo and holigram anaylsis:
Further more he has these qulifications which I must say is supportive of his expertise.
PhD - BSc (Hons) Class I/Applied Physics.
PhD in Holographic Computer Measurement.
Chartered Physicist and a Member of the Insitute of Physics.
In addition to these the moon landings of america has been constantly accused of being faked at the start of the 21st century. Further more we are not talking about a someone does not know what he is talking about, this person is no amature, he is an expert. He was also able to gain and analyse one of the shoes of the astronoughts.
It's discovered by him from the photos that indeed there was an artificail light source, however the appo 11 did bring lights with them so where did it come from? Inaddition this scientist also manage to overthrow the view that the light came from a natural souce the sun, however as he explained on the video the brightness of the sun light reflected on the moon should be constant however, tiny rocks are not even lit and has massive shadows, proving once again that this could not have possibly been the real moon service.

2)Observational reliability I belieave this video has alot of observational reliablitity as we are shown images and evidence of what they belieave is faked on the pictures of the moon landing of apollo 11. Inaddtion to this they also give cameria views on minture made models of the apollo 11 and did tests to see if the picture matches the artfical lighting they have created on the model.

3)Awareness of value, judgments and propaganda - This maybe a british video, however briton is an ally of america and there is no need to disclaim such a unbelieavable thing in american history. However even the Americans them selves have a documentary on the apollo 11 being faked. To have so many documentaries on appollo being faked is interesting, and not only from other countries but from america itself.

4)Authority/ citation/ peer review - This video has strong and powerful authority as it is based upon the views of experts inaddtion using modern technology to analyise pictures taken. We have been show the the possible solutions that other have comed up with for faked lighting, however they have proved all them wrong now. Even using the most famous picture of the reflection in the viser they have proved that it did no come from a natural light and the camera was not in the correct position according to the picture.

5)Awareness of source, intention and audience - There is intension is to show us that through their expertise they have proved that pictures of moon landings have been staged. They may want to get fame or things by making things up however, they have gotten hold on some rare equipment like astronoughts shoes, specailzed computers that anaylize images. Like i said these people are not amatures they are expert photo analysis.

In conclusion, this video has powerful evidence and the source of which it came from is very solid. They show us pictures and solid evidence and techincal terms of techniques in photography. To sum it all up we have ask WHY HASN'T AMERICA EVER SENT ANOTHER TEAM TO THE MOON?

No comments: